As I am sure most of you are familiar with, the talk of planking has been phenomenal – especially in online communities.
If I type ‘planking’ onto my Facebook search engine, the amount of pages I find is ridiculous. Some of the pages are:
- Not planking because I have a normal life (1,205 members)
- I didn’t pass out I was just planking the gutter (21, 052 members)
- You know you’re Australian when you can make planking a sport (4,250 members)
- I prefer the upright version of planking, it’s called standing (51, 490 members)
The parallels I am trying to create between this planking phenomenon and Net Communications is the way Web 2.0 applications such as Facebook etc has the power to speedily communicate a message through creating pages through social networking sites. Further I have listed the amount of members that have joined each page as to reveal what the online community find most popular and what they most find amusing.
I was having a conversation with one of my friends when he mentioned that four people that worked at his local Safeway got fired for planking. Puzzled I asked how his employers found out. He said they found photographs of the boys planking at work on Facebook.
I decided to Google this and I found an article, http://www.news.com.au/business/business-smarts/woolworths-sacks-staff-as-planking-craze-sweeps-australia/story-e6frfm9r-1226059282699
It’s interesting to see that employers have the power to access Facebook to determine terminating the contracts of their employees.
As the article investigates “A spokeswoman said the company [Safeway] became aware of the stunts when it was tipped off by colleagues and directed to images on Facebook“.
Thus it can be concluded that Facebook as a product of Web 2.0 not only can be used as a social tool but now extends to aiding employers when making decisions to terminate contracts with existing employees.
Is this fair/ unfair?
Tell me what you think.